the PRODOS blog

Have a hug. Read Atlas Shrugged.

Category: Green Poppycock (page 2 of 5)

NOT EVIL JUST WRONG: Some feedback from PRODOS screening, Melbourne, Australia

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP3AJva7C0s]

Above, a few people give their feedback after the PRODOS screening of NOT EVIL JUST WRONG on Sunday October 16 2009 in Melbourne, Australia.

Thanks to Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney for creating this superb documentary and for organizing the worldwide “tea party” Premiere.

Thanks also to Tim Andrews and Andrew Landeryou for their assistance.

Help_me_Mr_Al_Gore

Report This Post

Dr Alan Moran at Senate Hearing on Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009

Tim Warner, Prodos, and Dr Alan Moran (a real goddam economist)

Tim Warner, Prodos, and Dr Alan Moran (a real goddam economist)

After spending so much time on the brain-numbing Greg Lindsay/John Humphreys Carbon Tax, how refreshing to study a real economist!

With some of my own comments and highlighting of points included, here is Dr Alan Moran, Director of the Deregulation Unit, Institute of Public Affairs – speaking and getting grilled at a Senate Hearing on the Rudd government’s proposed ETS.

Must-read Bonus: Senator Doug Cameron (Australian Labor Party) dresses in a Panda suit and gets shot out of a cannon.

Continue reading

Report This Post

Transcripts of 2 videos: Carbon Tax promoted by John Humphreys and Greg Lindsay

Here are transcriptions of the two videos first presented at my blog post, John Humprheys and Greg Lindsay promote Carbon Tax for Australia

I’m providing these transcripts after coming across a number of misrepresentations of the content I inserted into these videos.

Unless otherwise indicated, indented quotes are of segments inserted into the original video by me.Their exact placement in this transcript isn’t quite accurate since some of the inserted segments rolled out over time while the presentation was going on.

Unless otherwise indicated, the non-indented text is of  John Humphreys (Mannkal Scholar/Research Fellow, with the Economics Programme at the CIS) speaking.

video 1 of 2 starts

Continue reading

Report This Post

Fielding the Climate Questions

While starry-eyed supporters of Greg Lindsay and the Centre for Independent Studies  proclaim undying loyalty and admiration for the man who proudly:  “… has NEVER personally taken any position at all on global warming,” Australian  Senator Steve Fielding (Family First Party, Victoria, Australia) has decided it’s his responsibility to now TAKE a position – by first informing himself carefully and rigorously about the “real debate”.

No, not the one about whether it’s better to wreck our living standards with an Emissions Trading System (ETS) – OR – a Carbon Tax.

The other.The REAL “real debate”.

Steve Fielding:

So far I don’t think there’s been a real debate about the science

Shortly after returning from a Climate Skeptics conference at the American Heartland Institute, he wrote in The Australian:

It  seems every Australian has an opinion on the Rudd government’s emissions trading scheme. Green groups have been calling for stronger emissions targets while businesses have been pushing for more assistance to be granted to affected industries. Others simply argue that Australia should be waiting until Copenhagen before rushing ahead with any scheme. The one question, however, that no one seems to be asking, is whether or not we even need an emissions trading scheme at all?

… Perhaps CO2 is not the bogeyman of the climate world as many would have us believe.

AAP reports:

Senator Steve Fielding wants to debate the cause of global warming with government scientists before voting on climate change legislation.

Andrew Bolt writes:

… Fielding, an engineer, is now insisting he be shown the proof that the world is even still warming, and the (Australian) Government must at last justify its plan’s most basic assumption.

Its “most basic assumption”? But that’s the one Greg Lindsay and John Humphreys use as their “starting assumption” – cunningly opposing an Emission Trading Scheme for Australia … by proposing a Carbon Tax for Australia. Isn’t it?

With a vote coming up soon on the government’s proposed ETS –  Senator Fielding said:

he wants the science “cleared up” before he decides how to vote.

When a happy-clappy Christian politician makes more sense than a Hayek-inspired free market think tank, it’s enough to makes devout atheists start wondering, what on earth is God really up to?

Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant

Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant

Report This Post

Economist, Des Moore: “Alternative” energy sources will lower Australia’s living standards

Des Moore: Alternative energy sources will lower Australia's living standards

Des Moore: Alternative energy sources will lower living standards

Des Moore, Institute for Private Enterprise, writing on Australia’s Henry Thornton blog

Continue reading

Report This Post

ARE YOU A MORON?

ARE YOU A MORON?

ARE YOU A MORON?

Do you believe in …

  • Global Warming?
  • Scientific Consensus?
  • The Debate is over?
  • Renewables?
  • Taxing Carbon?
  • Green Jobs?
  • CO2 is a pollutant?
  • ARE YOU A MORON?

Green Poppycock merchandise @ WeLoveCapitalism.com

A Happy CO2 to you too!

A Happy CO2 to you too!

Carbon Dioxide is NOT a pollutant

Carbon Dioxide is NOT a pollutant

Greens Lie - People Die

Greens Lie - People Die

A happy CO2 to you too!

A Happy CO2 to you too!

Green Poppycock merchandise @ WeLoveCapitalism.com

Report This Post

John Humphreys and Greg Lindsay promote Carbon Tax for Australia

Greg Lindsay, Centre for Independent Studies

Greg Lindsay, Centre for Independent Studies

Below, 2 videos of John Humphreys, Mannkal Scholar and Research Fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS)  promoting a Carbon Tax for Australia.

Greg Lindsay, CIS founder, although not seen in these videos excerpts, is present at this Climate Change Policy roundtable discussion.

The ostensive purpose of the meeting is to argue why a Carbon Tax is better than an ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme).

Achieving CO2 reduction is treated as a “starting assumption”.

The “No Tax – No ETS” position is not discussed.

At odds with Greg Lindsay‘s professed understanding and support of Hayek – and presumably Hayek’s extensive writings on Capital Structure – a “revenue neutral” Carbon Tax is proposed and even lauded as a “no regrets” approach.

This is combined with an “extrapolate the past – accelerate the future” narrative, composed of technological “optimism” mixed together with an interventionist re-definition and usurping of the concept of “the price mechanism” by John Humphreys. The effect is surreal.

The complete, un-edited video of this CIS roundtable can be viewed HERE.

Text comments by me inserted throughout both the following two videos:

Continue reading

Report This Post

Baker goes Biblical on Barack

[photopress:barack_obama_we_can_believe.jpg,full,pp_image]

A splendid satirical piece about the Barack Obama phenomenon, by TimesOnline.co.uk writer, Gerard Baker:

He ventured forth to bring light to the world
(Here are afew excerpts)

… He travelled fleet of foot and light of camel, with a small retinue that consisted only of his loyal disciples from the tribe of the Media.

… For as long as the Child stood with his arms raised aloft, the enemy suffered great blows and the threat of terror was no more.

… And lo, in Mesopotamia, a miracle occurred. Even though the Great Surge of Armour that the evil Bush had ordered had been a terrible mistake, a waste of vital military resources and doomed to end in disaster, the Child’s very presence suddenly brought forth a great victory for the forces of the light.

… And the Persians, who saw all this and were greatly fearful, longed to speak with the Child and saw that the Child was the bringer of peace. At the mention of his name they quickly laid aside their intrigues and beat their uranium swords into civil nuclear energy ploughshares.

… And they told of strange and wondrous things that greeted the news of the Child’s journey. Around the world, global temperatures began to decline, and the ocean levels fell and the great warming was over ….

If only that includedthe media infatuation.

Report This Post

Dihydrogen Monoxide and other dangers

[photopress:Penn_and_Teller.jpg,full,pp_image]

Below,are 3 YouTubes of the 2003 Penn & Teller: Bullshit! show titled: Environmental Hysteria, (Season 1, Episode 13) including their highly successful petition to ban Dihydrogen Monoxide (i.e. H2O… i.e.Water).

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07P5LLVTNu4]
Part 1 of 3

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSsp1KNJN2A]
Part 2 of 3

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMBKe6cTvyE]
Part 3 of 3

By the way, Penn Jillette of “Penn& Teller” is a research fellow at CATO Institute.

According to LogicalScience.com: “This gives Penn Jillete a conflict of interest when it comes to any topic that might require government regulation.”

Report This Post

Anna Blainey: Workers to feel pinch and deliver knock-out punch to Greens – Not Big Bad Big Business

[photopress:anna_blainey_and_her_dad_geoffrey_blainey.jpg,full,pp_image]
Dr Anna Blainey about to marry Timothy Warner.
Pictured entering the Church with her Dad, Professor Geoffrey Blainey.

Australian Historian, Dr Anna Blainey, wrote to me the other day:

It’s interesting – the global warming advocates have always claimed that the only people who have any reason to object to global warming reduction measures are those who make profits from fossil fuels, “big oil” etc.

The idea is that anyone else would welcome a carbon tax (or emissions trading or whatever) with open arms.

The fact that you can’t punish “big oil” or “big coal” without hurting their employees and consumers – and the employees of their consumers! – is never mentioned!

When the general public feels the pinch of high energy and transportation costs, and the protests come from the working people and not just the energy tycoons, the greens are going to have drop the pretence that they’re the big daring champions of the underdog fighting big bad big business.

That’s when things will really start to unravel.

The places where fossil fuel taxes (or emissions trading) might have a less drastic impact [on working people] are those which have a cheap alternative energy already in place eg, France and Sweden who have most of their energy already coming from nuclear power.

However, Australia is not one of those places.

Report This Post

Older posts Newer posts

© 2017 the PRODOS blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Report This Blog