Have a hug. Read Atlas Shrugged.

New York Times reports on Atlas Shrugged movie

Angie-angelina-jolie-31763165-1600-1200

Angelina Jolie to play Ayn Rand’s heroine, Dagny Taggart?
Sure! Why not? 😀 😀

Betsy Speicher’s CyberNet reports on an article about the Atlas Shrugged movie project:

The Arts/Movie section of today’s (01/14/07) Sunday New York Times has a large article on the past and present attempts to make a movie of _Atlas Shrugged_. Although some of the quotes and the writer’s conclusions are
dubious, there are many interesting facts about the subject as well.

Here’s the article:

Ayn Rand No Longer Has Script Approval (January 14, 2007)

By KIMBERLY BROWN, LOS ANGELES

BACK in the 1970s Albert S. Ruddy, the producer of “The Godfather,” first approached Ayn Rand to make a movie of her novel “Atlas Shrugged.” But Rand, who had fled the Soviet Union and gone on to inspire capitalists and egoists everywhere, worried aloud, apparently in all seriousness, that the Soviets might try to take over Paramount to block the project.

“I told her, ‘The Russians aren’t that desperate to wreck your book,’ ” Mr. Ruddy recalled in a recent interview.

Rand’s paranoia, as Mr. Ruddy remembers it, seems laughable. But perhaps it was merely misplaced. For so many people have tried and failed to turn the book she considered her masterpiece into a movie that it could easily strike a suspicious person as evidence of a nefarious collectivist conspiracy. Or at least of Hollywood’s mediocrity.

Of course Rand herself had a hand in blocking some of those attempts before she died in 1982. Her heirs in the Objectivist school of thought helped sink some others. And plans for at least a couple of television mini-series fell to the vicissitudes of network politics and media mergers.

But Rand’s grand polemical novel keeps selling, and her admirers in Hollywood keep trying, and the latest effort involves a lineup of heavy hitters, starting with Angelina Jolie. Randall Wallace, who wrote “Braveheart” and “We Were Soldiers,” is working on compressing the nearly 1,200-page book into a conventional two-hour screenplay. Howard and Karen Baldwin, the husband-and-wife producers of “Ray,” are overseeing the project, and Lions Gate Entertainment is footing the bill.

Whether Ms. Jolie, who has called herself something of a Rand fan, will bring the novel’s heroine, Dagny Taggart, to life on screen, or merely wind up on a list with other actresses who sought or were sought for the role — including Barbara Stanwyck, Faye Dunaway, Raquel Welch, Farrah Fawcett and Sharon Stone — remains to be seen. Until now, at least, no one in Hollywood has figured out a formula that promises both to sell popcorn and to do justice to the original text, let alone to the philosophy that it hammers home endlessly, at times in lengthy speeches. (The final one is 60 pages long.)

But Mr. Baldwin said he believed that Mr. Wallace and the rest of their team were up to the task. “We all believe in the book, and will be true to the book,” he said.

Easier said than done. Published in 1957 and set in the near future, “Atlas Shrugged” plots the collapse of American society after thinkers, industrialists, scientists, artists and other innovators — Rand’s kind of people — go on strike and disappear, refusing to contribute to a collectivist world. Dagny, a railroad heiress, tries to save the country from starvation and total collapse, while falling in love with the mysterious John Galt, who she later learns was the man who started the strike. The novel ends after an apocalypse.

During Rand’s lifetime, her Objectivism, which celebrates rational self-interest and capitalism, was widely dismissed by academia and disparaged by both the political right and left. The reviews for “Atlas Shrugged” were not much kinder. “It howls in the reader’s ear and beats him about the head in order to secure his attention,” Granville Hicks wrote in The New York Times, “and then, when it has him subdued, harangues him for page upon page. It has only two moods, the melodramatic and the didactic, and in both it knows no bounds.”

Yet “Atlas” was a best seller. Six million copies have been sold over the years, and it remains a popular title, particularly among college students, according to Penguin Group, its publisher. Many of those copies wind up on shelves on Wall Street, where the book has been affectionately referred to as “the Bible of selfishness.”

Hollywood took notice of the novel’s popularity from the start, but Rand refused to consider movie offers: she had been burned, she felt, by the experience of turning her earlier (and, at 720 pages, comparatively short) novel, “The Fountainhead,” into the 1949 film starring Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal.

Rand had adapted it herself, but she battled with the director, King Vidor, over changes to her screenplay. In the end a single line was cut from a six-minute speech by Cooper’s character, Howard Roark, reportedly leaving Rand embittered by the experience. She vowed that Warner Brothers would not be permitted to adapt “Atlas” unless the studio recut “The Fountainhead,” returning the edited line to its rightful place, said her biographer Jeff Britting.

In 1972, 15 years after the novel’s publication, Mr. Ruddy, fresh from producing “The Godfather,” decided to make a run at Rand, who was already in her late 60s. “ ‘Atlas Shrugged,’ let’s face it, was probably the most important novel of the 20th century that was never a film,” he said.

Rand’s agents warned him to expect rejection, he said, but reluctantly set up an appointment. He recalled meeting her in a room with one small love seat and many empty chairs. Mr. Ruddy, 6-foot-4, squeezed in next to the petite aging writer on the small couch and commenced to woo her.

“I knew from ‘Atlas Shrugged’ that she dug men, that she was a lusty woman,” he recalled in a telephone interview. “We start talking. It’s instant love.” Before long, he said, Rand was telling him, in her heavy accent, “I want you to do ‘Atlas Shrugged.’ ”

Mr. Ruddy said he warned Rand that it was not her ideas that interested him. “Forget philosophy,” he said. “The abstract of the story is quite lovely: the power and the sustainability of the great individual, of the creative person, of the entrepreneur.” Rand, he said, “thought that was brilliant, because that’s how she saw her book,” as a story first.

Mr. Ruddy said he looked past most of her eccentricities; she insisted on flying only by private plane, for example, because she feared that “if the Russians found out that she was on a commercial airliner, they’d hijack it,” he said.

But Mr. Ruddy refused to grant Rand final script approval, and their courtship quickly broke off. “It’s a fool’s game to spend a lot of money and time only to have her say, ‘I think you should take this out,’ ” he said. So, he recalled, he told Rand that he would wait for her to “drop dead” and then make the movie on his own terms.

With Mr. Ruddy out of the picture, Rand began fielding new offers from movie and television producers. In 1978 Henry Jaffe and his son Michael negotiated a deal for an eight-hour mini-series on NBC. Michael Jaffe, now a partner at Jaffe/Braunstein Films, obtained script approval for Rand, and they hired Sterling Silliphant, the screenwriter of the Sidney Poitier movie “In the Heat of the Night,” to adapt “Atlas Shrugged.” Rand was unsatisfied with his script; she called Mr. Silliphant’s writing too “naturalistic” and drew a line at his insertion of the word “just” into a single line of dialogue. (Mr. Jaffe, in an interview, took up Rand’s defense: “It made the sentence become ambiguous,” he said. “Her characters didn’t say ambiguous things.”)

Yet it was a regime change at NBC — specifically Fred Silverman’s ascension to the network presidency — that killed the project in 1979. The network suddenly viewed “Atlas Shrugged” as too burdened with philosophy, its characters as too black-and-white, its subject too ponderous.

At the end of her life Rand tried to write her own script, as she had done for “The Fountainhead,” but she died with only a third of her hoped-for mini-series finished.

Rand left her estate to a longtime student, Leonard Peikoff, who eventually sold an option to Michael Jaffe and Ed Snider, a friend of Rand’s who owned the Philadelphia Flyers hockey team. But Mr. Peikoff refused to approve the script they developed. “Leonard had huge problems with it,” Mr. Jaffe said. “He wasn’t Ayn. But he wanted to exercise her control.”

Other producers came and went, and in 1992 a New Jersey investor and Objectivist, John Aglialoro, bought an option to make “Atlas Shrugged,” eventually paying Mr. Peikoff more than $1 million in exchange for full creative control.

Under Mr. Aglialoro’s sponsorship a succession of writers and producers developed at least four scripts. One writer was Mr. Peikoff’s ex-wife, Cynthia Peikoff, who had been Rand’s typist. Some of the scripts, she said, were too sci-fi, others reduced the novel’s characters to caricatures, and she was told that her own attempt was no better than “workmanlike.”

In 1999 Mr. Ruddy resurfaced, cutting a deal with TNT for a four-hour mini-series version. “A dream come true,” he called it at the time. But a threatened actors’ strike delayed production, and the project was dropped after AOL and Time Warner merged.

Then 9/11 worsened the climate for films with apocalyptic visions. “I could have stayed with it and kept pushing it,” Mr. Ruddy said. “But now people start jumping out of their seats when a building blows up.”

Mr. Ruddy’s exit opened the door to the Baldwins, who optioned the rights to “Atlas Shrugged” from Mr. Aglialoro while running the billionaire Phil Anschutz’s Crusader Entertainment. (Mr. Baldwin, oddly enough, had once been a ticket manager for Mr. Snider’s Flyers.) James V. Hart, who had written “Contact,” developed a draft of the first installment of a three-movie series, but the Baldwins could land neither stars nor financing.

There was also some thought that Mr. Anschutz, whose movies are often designed to accommodate a religiously devout audience, may have lost enthusiasm for the project when he learned that Rand was an outspoken atheist, but an Anschutz spokesman called this a misunderstanding. In any case, when the Baldwins left Crusader in 2004 to set up their own production company, they took the rights to “Atlas Shrugged” with them

Last spring in a twist that might have amused Rand and Mr. Anschutz, the latest deal for an “Atlas Shrugged” film project had its inception during Mass at the Church of the Good Shepherd, in Beverly Hills.

Mr. Baldwin said that a fellow parishioner, Michael Burns — the vice chairman of Lions Gate — approached Mr. Baldwin and his wife “right under the nose of the priest,” whispering to them about the rights to Rand’s novel and asking to “meet right away.”

Mr. Burns — who remembered the conversation taking place outside, after Mass — said he had first read “Atlas” in high school and has given as many as 100 copies as gifts over the years.

“I think it solidified my capitalistic thinking, in that I believe very strongly that people are generally selfish, but that selfishness can ultimately benefit many, many people,” Mr. Burns said.

The Baldwins used Mr. Hart’s script to interest Ms. Jolie in the project, through her manager, Geyer Kosinski. (Mr. Kosinski said Ms. Jolie declined to comment.) Together the Baldwins, Mr. Burns and Mr. Kosinski, who is also to be one of the producers, quickly approached Mr. Wallace about a new adaptation. And in what Mr. Wallace called an uncanny coincidence, he had recently read “Atlas” for the first time, when he and his college-age son had swapped their favorite books.

The challenge, Mr. Wallace said, was immediately tempting. As for how he is distilling Rand’s novel and its Castro-length monologues to a two-hour screenplay, Mr. Wallace insisted he had the material under control and was on course to deliver a finished draft this month.

“I can pretty much guarantee you that there won’t be a 30-page speech at the end of the movie,” he said. “I have two hours to try to express what Rand believed to an audience, and my responsibility is not only to Ayn Rand, but to the audience, that this be a compelling movie. More people will see the movie than will read ‘Atlas Shrugged.’ And the movie has to work.”

Report This Post

15 Comments

  1. zigory

    A two-hour screenplay that tries to encapsulate the 1084-page book’s plot and ideas, cannot convey anything substantial about Atlas Shrugged. It would be like reading an outline for a proposed movie. It would be less fulfilling than Cliff’s Notes. A better idea would be to take a single 100-page segment of the novel and dramatize it, not pretend to represent the whole novel. My hope is that Randall Wallace will be greedy enough to want three paydays instead of one, and write a trilogy after all.

    Report This Comment

  2. Nick Tower

    Zig, I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment. It really bummed me to read that recent article with Wallace sounding as if he was going to slice, dice, and essentially popularize the novel into a gutless audience pleaser. If he does, and it’s a bomb, I doubt the movie will ever have a second chance to be remade. I’d rather see nothing rather than a butcher’s job edit to Atlas Shrugged. I have to hope that the novel’s three logical parts — each with it’s own arc and climax — will simply make him want to make the same choice that George Lucas made for his huge script he wrote for star wars, of which he took the first third and made into the first episode 30 years ago. Seems to me you can easily compress more than 100 pages into each hour of screen time, meaning if you followed the book exactly (which I’m not advocating, but for my point), then a trilogy of 3-hour movies is in order (ala lord of the rings). PLEASE RANDALL!! Give us ‘Atlas Shrugged : Non-Contradiction’ as episode 1.

    Report This Comment

  3. Cassi

    There is a reason Atlas Shrugged has not been made into a film. John Galt’s speeches are the book. To cut out any part of his speech would be to change the philosophical maening of the novel. And for someone like Wallace who has only read the novel once to try to undergo a project such as this is ridiculous. If you want someone to write a script for Atlas the least you could do to honor her work is get someone who knows Rand’s work well, and understands that the philosophy of the book is just as important as the story.
    Finding actors to portray the roles correctly would be just as dificult. Very few people in Hollywood posess the morals needed for these characters. Yes as actors they should be able to make one believe that they feel, and believe what these characters feel and believe. However to portray any character of Ayn Rand’s and make it believable to those who know and love her work, the actors themselves must share those same morals. And although Angelina Jolie by comparison to most everyone in Hollywood is a better person than they are, she is NO Dagney Taggart.

    Report This Comment

  4. Dean

    An anti-collectivist movie starring an enthusiastic UN cheerleader?

    Phhhtttt!!!! Riiiiiiiight!

    Report This Comment

  5. Arlo J. Pignotti

    Atlas Shrugged can be made into a TV series. And if done right, it would be captivating enough for one of the episodes to be John Galt’s speech broadcast to viewers just like in the book. It’s never been done before and anyone who is unfamiliar with the book will think it won’t work. But anyone who’d watch the many episodes that lead up to that speech would be ready and willing to hear John Galt’s speech.

    Report This Comment

  6. Jayesh

    Fully agree guys. there are a lot of people who are ayn rand fans, & they have read the books multiple times, the galt speech zillion times. No Speech, no atlas shrugged. its like making fountainhead without the temple. (by the way, the fountainhead movie is horrible)

    Report This Comment

  7. PRODOS

    Thanks for your views.

    Jayesh writes “the fountainhead movie is horrible”.

    Interesting, I was talking to a journo last week who loved it. He works for a left-wing paper here in Melbourne. He’d noticed that I was an Ayn Rand fan and contacted me and is interested in reading and learning more about Ayn Rand’s work.

    I’ve met other individuals whose first meeting with Ayn Rand was via The Fountainhead movie. Of course, like many movie adaptations of grand literature, dedicated fans of the literature can’t help noticing what’s missing. But those who see the movie first focus on what’s in the movie. And sometimes may follow up by reading the literature.

    As for Atlas Shrugged, I think it can work as a single movie. If it’s compelling enough in spirit to lead a good number of people to then go and read the novel, I’ll be happy with that.

    But of course, as Arlo J. Pignotti points out a series of films would be ideal.

    Zigory writes: “My hope is that Randall Wallace will be greedy enough to want three paydays instead of one, and write a trilogy after all.” Now, I like the sound of that! 🙂

    The novel presents a very complicated story. But the basic idea underlying all the events is not that complicated.

    On the other hand, will the screenwriters, director, producer, etc. both understand the idea and be able to convey its essence and spirit?

    I really don’t know.

    Report This Comment

  8. Michael

    Atlas Shrugged into a 2 or even 3 hour movie makes me cringe!

    A TV series possibly, but I would never trust the major commercial networks.

    Maybe something PBS or the Brits can do in order to give respect to the entire text that it rightfully derserves.

    How ironic is that.

    Report This Comment

  9. PRODOS

    Thanks for your comment Michael.

    Best Wishes,

    PRODOS

    Report This Comment

  10. Corey

    Are you all insane? Most of those that write here believe ine Ayn Rand and all she stands for… but 6 million copies were sold… why do we need a TV show to butcher anything that we so up rightously uphold? Screw any TV shit!!!

    Report This Comment

  11. PRODOS

    Replying to Corey

    Are you all insane? Most of those that write here believe ine Ayn Rand and all she stands for

    Report This Comment

  12. jasmine

    haha…
    jolie…
    as dagny taggart?
    the selfless, un ambassador
    as the selfish heiress of taggart transcontinental…
    pfffffffffft
    puh-lease!
    hahaha
    but…
    i am excited about the posibility of this becoming a movie, this being my favorite book, i am interested to see how the hollywood producers will rewrite it

    Report This Comment

  13. PRODOS

    Good afternoon jasmine.

    haha

    Report This Comment

  14. Jean

    I haven’t heard anything about the movie since 2007. Is it still happening?

    Report This Comment

  15. AndyF

    I’ve read Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead both multiple times, as well as Anthem(excellent novelette, could make a great movie if it was expanded into a 90-minute screenplay by the right people) and I have a hard time believing that a film adaptation is possible. I know a trilogy would be doable, but one thing I hated about the Lord of The Rings trilogy was waiting for the next one. Of course that would be better than a hacked-up 3 hour long screenplay that murders the whole book… I dunno guys. Maybe no movie at all would be better than screwing this book up in the minds of impressionable audience members that don’t know what they should be seeing.
    Incidentally, have there been any proposals on making Anthem into a movie? Because that book is the simplest portrayal of Ayn Rand’s philosophies I’ve seen.

    Report This Comment

Leave a Reply

© 2020 the PRODOS blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Report This Blog